The Argument from Design
Inductive Arguments
In a valid deductive argument, the truth of the premisses guarantees the truth of the
conclusion. In a good inductive argument, the truth of the premisses does not guarantee
the truth of the conclusion; rather the premisses confirm, or support, or justify the conclusion.
1) Emerald #1 is green.
2) Emerald #2 is green.
.
.
.
n) Emerald #n is green.
_________
Probably,
n+1) All emeralds are green.
A Statement of the Argument
- Everything which exhibits design and is such that we know whether it was designed, was,
in fact, the product of intelligent design.
- The universe exhibits design.
Probably
- The universe was designed.
Compare:
- Everything that is a crow and is such that we have been able to tell what color it is
black.
- The largest crow in the Amazon is a crow.
Probably
- The largest crow in the Amazon is black.
Evaluation:
Consider:
(a) The universe was designed.
Hume gives three reasons why the argument doesn't establish (a).
I. The weaker the analogy the weaker the conclusion, and the analogy between the
universe and other things that exhibit design is too weak to support the conclusion (a).
II. A conclusion cannot be transferred from a part to the whole, and our only evidence
that the universe exhibits design is based on our examination of only a part of it.
III. No inductive reasoning can establish a conclusion about a unique object, and the
universe is unique.
Now consider:
How much support does the argument give to:
- (a) The universe was designed,
- (b) The universe was designed by exactly one person,
- (c) The universe was created ex nihilo,
- (d) The universe was created by the being who designed it,
- (e) The creator of the universe is omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly good,
- (f) The creator of the universe is an eternal spirit who still exists?
Given the premisses of the argument, the denial of {(b), (c), (d), (e),
(f)} is at least as likely as {(b), (c), (d), (e), (f)} is; therefore, the premisses
of the argument don't confirm or establish {(b), (c), (d), (e), (f)}.
Last updated August 2008 by
Edward Wierenga
Copyright © 2008 Edward Wierenga